Disciplinary Register
The Register of Disciplinary Action contains information about lawyers who have been disciplined
Disciplinary action may be taken by the Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner, the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, the Supreme Court or in some cases, by their interstate equivalents.
Below you can search the Register by lawyer’s name and/or the disciplinary action taken, or view the entire Register.
A finding of Professional Misconduct, whether made by the Commissioner, the Tribunal or the Supreme Court, must be published on the Register.
A less serious finding of Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct may be included on the Register, at the discretion of the Commissioner.
Not all lawyers subject to disciplinary action prior to 1 July 2014 are listed on the Register. Only lawyers who have been struck-off (ie removed from practice), suspended from practice or placed under supervision for a period of time (and which was in effect as at 1 July 2014) are on the Register. Some information is not on the Register for older disciplinary actions.
Lawyers found guilty of misconduct in other jurisdictions may have their details published on an interstate disciplinary action register.
If a finding that is entered on the Register is appealed, then the fact of the appeal will also be noted on the Register. If the appeal, or indeed any review:
- results in the finding being quashed, then any reference to that disciplinary action must be removed from the Register;
- results in the finding being otherwise varied, then the Register will be amended appropriately.
The Commissioner has a discretion to remove information that was previously included on the Register. They can only do so where the information relates to relatively minor misconduct, and only if it has been at least 2 years since the later of:
- the inclusion of the information on the Register; and
- the fulfilment of the order or requirement to which the information relates.
Disclaimer: The Commissioner is required to maintain the Register of Disciplinary Action in accordance with the Act, Section 89C. While all reasonable care is taken to make sure the information on the Register is correct and up-to-date, the Commissioner is not liable for any loss or damage that may result from reliance on the Register or from any error or deficiency in the Register. The Commissioner also has certain specific protections from liability under section 89F of the Act.
| Date of decision | Full name | Decision | Disciplinary action taken | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Anastasia Angeliki Rabah | Professional Misconduct | Multiple Disciplinary Action | |
|
Full name
Anastasia Angeliki Rabah
Business address *
Level 5, 28 Grenfell Street, Adelaide SA 5000
Date(s) of admission
29 April 2009, 01 March 2009
Jurisdiction(s) of admission
Home jurisdiction *
South Australia
Substance of Conduct Matter
Knowingly or recklessly misleading the court by the inclusion of non-existent (hallucinated) authorities in written submissions.
Decision
Professional Misconduct
Date of decision
12 February 2026
Disciplinary action taken
Notes
The Practitioner will not be entitled to hold a Category A, B, BA, unrestricted C or unrestricted D practising certificate for 14 days following the date of the Determination until she has completed supervised practice by way of a continuous period of two years’ full time employment as an employed practitioner or an equivalent of part time-employment, following the issue of a Category C (restricted) practising certificate.
Regulatory authority
Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner
Appeal
Decision or order
Decision not published
|
||||
| 2026 | Brenton John Miegel | Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct | Multiple Disciplinary Action | |
|
Full name
Brenton John Miegel
Business address *
4 Elizabeth Street, Tanunda SA 5352
Date(s) of admission
04 December 1978
Jurisdiction(s) of admission
Home jurisdiction *
South Australia
Substance of Conduct Matter
Between 2021 and 2022, the Practitioner failed to advance his client’s instructions. During my investigation, the Practitioner repeatedly failed to cooperate with my investigation.
Decision
Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
Date of decision
06 February 2026
Disciplinary action taken
Notes
Fine amount $2,000.00
Regulatory authority
Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner
Appeal
Decision or order
Decision not published
|
||||
| 2026 | Anthony James Vincent Kerin | Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct | Multiple Disciplinary Action | |
|
Full name
Anthony James Vincent Kerin
Business address *
Level 2, 44 Waymouth Street, Adelaide SA 5000
Date(s) of admission
17 December 1984
Jurisdiction(s) of admission
Home jurisdiction *
South Australia
Substance of Conduct Matter
1. Persistent, lengthy and inexplicable delays in providing legal services, in breach of the following South Australian Legal Practitioners Conduct Rules:
• to act in the best interest of their client (Rule 4.1.1);
• to be honest in all dealings in the course of legal practice (Rule 4.1.2);
• to deliver legal services competently, diligently and as promptly as reasonably possible (Rule 4.1.3);
• to provide clear and timely advice to assist a client to understand the relevant legal issues to be able to make informed choices about the action to take (Rule 7.1); and
2. Failure to provide updated written costs disclosure, in breach of Schedule 3, Part 3, Clause 17 of the Legal Practitioners Act 1981.
Decision
Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
Date of decision
29 January 2026
Disciplinary action taken
Notes
Other: with the consent of the Practitioner, a refund of professional fees of $11,300.
Regulatory authority
Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner
Appeal
Decision or order
Decision not published
|
||||
| 2026 | Damien Andrew O'Dea | Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct | Multiple Disciplinary Action | |
|
Full name
Damien Andrew O'Dea
Business address *
991 South Road, Melrose Park SA 5039
Date(s) of admission
12 November 2007
Jurisdiction(s) of admission
Home jurisdiction *
South Australia
Substance of Conduct Matter
Failure to make written costs disclosure to a client as soon as reasonably practicable after being retained or at all, contrary to Schedule 3, Part 3, clause 10 and 12(1) of the Legal Practitioners Act 1981.
Decision
Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct
Date of decision
12 January 2026
Disciplinary action taken
Notes
Fine amount $2,500.00.
Regulatory authority
Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner
Appeal
Decision or order
Decision not published
|
||||
| 2025 | Tracey Lee Riddle | Professional Misconduct | Multiple Disciplinary Action | |
|
Full name
Tracey Lee Riddle
Business address *
Level 6, 19 Gilles Street, Adelaide SA 5000
Date(s) of admission
06 December 2004
Jurisdiction(s) of admission
Home jurisdiction *
South Australia
Substance of Conduct Matter
Practising while in breach of a condition on her Practising Certificate regarding completion of an accredited Law Practice Management Course.
Decision
Professional Misconduct
Date of decision
04 December 2025
Disciplinary action taken
Notes
Fine amount $4,000.00
Regulatory authority
Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner
Appeal
Decision or order
Decision not published
|
||||