Disciplinary Register

The Register of Disciplinary Action contains information about lawyers who have been disciplined

Disciplinary action may be taken by the Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner, the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, the Supreme Court or in some cases, by their interstate equivalents.

Below you can search the Register by lawyer’s name and/or the disciplinary action taken, or view the entire Register.

A finding of Professional Misconduct, whether made by the Commissioner, the Tribunal or the Supreme Court, must be published on the Register.

A less serious finding of Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct may be included on the Register, at the discretion of the Commissioner.

Not all lawyers subject to disciplinary action prior to 1 July 2014 are listed on the Register. Only lawyers who have been struck-off (ie removed from practice), suspended from practice or placed under supervision for a period of time (and which was in effect as at 1 July 2014) are on the Register. Some information is not on the Register for older disciplinary actions.

Lawyers found guilty of misconduct in other jurisdictions may have their details published on an interstate disciplinary action register.

If a finding that is entered on the Register is appealed, then the fact of the appeal will also be noted on the Register. If the appeal, or indeed any review:

results in the finding being quashed, then any reference to that disciplinary action must be removed from the Register;
results in the finding being otherwise varied, then the Register will be amended appropriately.

The Commissioner has a discretion to remove information that was previously included on the Register. They can only do so where the information relates to relatively minor misconduct, and only if it has been at least 2 years since the later of:

the inclusion of the information on the Register; and
the fulfilment of the order or requirement to which the information relates.

Disclaimer: The Commissioner is required to maintain the Register of Disciplinary Action in accordance with the Act, Section 89C. While all reasonable care is taken to make sure the information on the Register is correct and up-to-date, the Commissioner is not liable for any loss or damage that may result from reliance on the Register or from any error or deficiency in the Register. The Commissioner also has certain specific protections from liability under section 89F of the Act.

Lawyer name

Date of decision	Full name	Decision	Disciplinary action taken
2022	William Chau	Professional Misconduct	Multiple Disciplinary Action
Full name William Chau Business address * Suite 817, 147 Pirie Street ADELAIDE SA 5000 Date(s) of admission 14 April 2009 Jurisdiction(s) of admission South Australia Home jurisdiction * South Australia Substance of Conduct Matter Failure to deposit substantial amounts of trust money into a trust account Decision Professional Misconduct Date of decision 28 June 2022 Disciplinary action taken Multiple Disciplinary Action Conditions on Practising Certificate Fine Reprimand Undertake training, education or counselling Notes Fine of $9,000 to be paid in instalments over 24 months. Additional units of Mandatory Continuing Professional Education to be 3 units of training in trust accounting. Regulatory authority Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner Appeal Decision or order Decision not published
2022	Roxanne Marie McCardle	Unsatisfactory Profession Conduct	Recommend that proceedings be commenced in the Supreme Court
Full name Roxanne Marie McCardle Business address * PO Box 2370, Bundaberg QLD 4670 Date(s) of admission 08 May 2006 Jurisdiction(s) of admission South Australia Home jurisdiction * South Australia Substance of Conduct Matter Failure to adequately respond to two (2) Notices served under Schedule 4, Clause 4(1) of the Legal Practitioners Act 1981 Decision Unsatisfactory Profession Conduct Date of decision 03 June 2022 Disciplinary action taken Recommend that proceedings be commenced in the Supreme Court Notes Regulatory authority Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal Appeal Decision or order Link to published decision
2022	Stephen Patrick McNamara	The Practitioner’s name be struck off the Roll of Legal Practitioners.	Name removed from Roll of Legal Practitioners
Full name Stephen Patrick McNamara Business address * C/- Department for Correctional Services Date(s) of admission 07 February 1978 Jurisdiction(s) of admission South Australia Home jurisdiction * South Australia Substance of Conduct Matter Found guilty of a serious offence Decision The Practitioner’s name be struck off the Roll of Legal Practitioners. Date of decision 10 March 2022 Disciplinary action taken Name removed from Roll of Legal Practitioners Struck off Notes Regulatory authority Supreme Court Appeal Decision or order Link to published decision
2022	Ms Christie Lee Rigg	Professional Misconduct	Multiple Disciplinary Action
Full name Ms Christie Lee Rigg Business address * Level 3, 169 Fullarton Road DULWICH SA 5065 Date(s) of admission 21 September 2015 Jurisdiction(s) of admission South Australia Home jurisdiction * South Australia Substance of Conduct Matter Lack of progress and communication regarding a deceased estate, failure to refund filing fee paid once instructions terminated. Decision Professional Misconduct Date of decision 08 March 2022 Disciplinary action taken Multiple Disciplinary Action Fine Make a payment Order to apologise Refrain from doing something Reprimand Notes Practitioner is to refrain from charging for any work done and is to refund the filing fee paid by the Complainant Executor. Additional Comments or instructions: The amount of the fine is $2 500.00. Regulatory authority Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner Appeal Decision or order Decision not published
2021	David Luke Williams	Professional Misconduct	Multiple Disciplinary Action
Full name David Luke Williams Business address * 125 Lipson Street PORT ADELAIDE SA 5015 Date(s) of admission 11 October 2004 Jurisdiction(s) of admission South Australia Home jurisdiction * South Australia Substance of Conduct Matter The Practitioner’s practising certificate expired on 30 June 2015. It has not been renewed since that time. The Practitioner admitted to having knowingly appeared for a client in the Magistrates Court and the District Court on 5 separate occasions between 21July 2015 and 4 November 2015 when he was not the holder of a practising certificate. By virtue of not holding a current practising certificate, the Practitioner also did not hold professional indemnity insurance for the relevant period. The Practitioner’s conduct was in breach of section 21 of the Legal Practitioner’s Act, 1981 which provides that a person must not practise the profession of the law, or hold himself or herself out as being entitled to practise the profession of the law, unless the person holds a practising certificate. Decision Professional Misconduct Date of decision 22 December 2021 Disciplinary action taken Multiple Disciplinary Action Refrain from doing something Reprimand Notes The Practitioner was reprimanded and ordered to refrain from making any application for a practising certificate in any jurisdiction for a period of 4 months from the date of the Commissioner’s Determination. Regulatory authority Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner Appeal Decision or order Decision not published

« Prev 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next »

Disciplinary Register

The Register of Disciplinary Action contains information about lawyers who have been disciplined

Below you can search the Register by lawyer’s name and/or the disciplinary action taken, or view the entire Register.

Consumers

Consumers

Lawyers